Some thoughts on education and school
A couple of thoughts for thinking about… Perhaps the whole premise of “school” as we know it is incorrect?
- Learning is focused on K-12, plus an additional 4-8 years of college. Then what?
- The academics themselves have taken a front row seat. At best, academics should be a tool to learn the things you need in life.
- What is the main point of general education? Whatever a competent adult needs to live an effective and productive life should be the main goal of non-specialized education.
- This has little to do with many of the subjects that are so extensively taught, and much to do with subjects that are not little taught.
The saying “begin with the end in mind” needs applied. If you were to ask the typical person “why kids go to school”, you would get many varied answers. Some legit, and some stupid, but I guess there would be little consistency between answers.
If you told the average adult that they need to spend the next 16 years of their life, 40 hours per week, doing a job that does not pay, doing things that they do not want to do, and having no physical end result… what would they say? That is 1/5 of the average human life, and regardless of what you are doing, there had better be a really good reason for it.
Every learning activity should have a “end in mind”. I think a lot of kids are also confused about why they are put through so many grueling tasks, when they have more interesting things to do. Let’s break it down into basics…
- Learn to Read -> so you can learn and understand things
- Learn to Write -> so you can communicate with others
- Learn Arithmetic -> so you can “figure” problems out
- Learn History -> so you do not repeat the bad parts
- Learn Government -> so you can be an effective part of it
- Learn Language -> so you can communicate more widely
- Learn Science -> so you understand life around you
- Learn Physics -> so you can keep your car on the road
- Learn Accounting -> so you can handle finances in all areas of life
- Learn Management -> so you can handle the projects life gives you
- Learn Attention to Detail -> so you do not drop the ball in life
- Learn Health -> so you are able to maintain a healthy body
And so on…
If the learning is not producing the correct end result, then why waste huge amounts of time and money and life?
There need to be fundamental changes in the way leaning is handled. Anyone with experience should know that experience cannot be taught, that experience is valuable, and that experience comes only with doing.
Therefore, the goal of education should be to impart experience. In doing this, bookwork should be reduced, and practical projects should be emphasized. The end goal being to impart enough experience in enough areas that the student can live life without making the huge blunders that so many people have made.
But once “graduated”, this process of learning should not stop. In our culture, I am not aware of a place where diverse and experienced people gather to teach to those who wish to learn. Such a mechanism was outlined in two excellent books (IIRC): “The Man who Counted”, and “The Richest Man in Babylon”.
Quite frankly, the distinction between “student” and “adult” is a flaw in the way our culture thinks. Learning should never stop, neither should structured learning.
You can force a horse to water, but not make him drink. You can force a child to school, and not make him learn. And even if you do force him to learn, you will diminish his desire to learn. Everyone is different, headed to a different path in life, and their education should reflect that. But the best thing one can learn is the art of leaning itself.
In summary, I would like to see:
- Free learning centers where wise people gather to pass their knowledge and experience on to willing ears who hear.
- A culture that promotes the above, values wisdom, and makes learning a center of culture (rather than TV, for example).
- Parents who teach the above, teach their children, and form a belief in their children that learning is valuable and to be sought. Instead of school M-F.
- Only part time teachers, teaching the things they heavily practice in real life. Engineers teach math, writers teach writing, editors teach spelling, historians teach history, accountants teach accounting, scientists teach science, doctors teach health, etc…
- People are certified in their knowledge of general areas + specific areas by the successful execution of a challenge, teaching, or test that is a real life project, or if not, as close as possible. Similar to how Doctorate programs are currently structured, but much more diverse.
Following such an excellent general education, colleges could be far more focused on specialized knowledge needed for different fields.
While much of this may be difficult to achieve in our current culture, there are aspects which I have implemented already in our school program. My 3rd grader writes a real letter on real paper to a real person every day (bank teller, store owner, librarian, machine shop owner). This has several side effects:
- it builds his reputation
- it teaches him to read, write, and spell in a very practical way
- it teaches him to communicate
- it blesses many people
Likewise, the students needed flashcards so they could memorize the arithmetic tables… Rather than purchasing them, I had them create the cards themselves. Many good effects:
- Very effective learning
- Diligence and Patience
- A physical “end product” of their education
I have specifically focused extensively on reading and writing under the premise that: “if they can effectively communicate, they can learn anything.”
A response to Preventing a pirate attack
An open letter to Daniel Jones, of GDS Publishing Ltd.
“The definitive resource for the global oil and gas energy industries online…”
Hello Mr. Jones,
I just read your well done article on ways to prevent a pirate attack. I liked the infographic, and the descriptions that accompanied it.
While all seem to be interesting ideas, consider this:
Given that a M2 .50 caliber machine gun and spotlight mounted on the bow and stern would provide a physical, actual, capable, and pointed defense against any small to medium pirate attack…
Given that these ships travel in international water, where it is not reasonable to expect any police protection…
Given that the security issues of maintaining such weapons are important, but any organized army will entrust this and more powerful weapons to a trained 18 year old solider…
Given that the captain of the ship already has the responsiblity for life and wellbeing of his crew, not causing tremendous environmental disasters, and not crashing his ship…
Given that the pirates intend to use real military weapons to cause death and mayhem…
Why is it that such a reasonable (even if politically unlikely) method of defense was not even mentioned in your article — as if it didn’t exist?
As if it didn’t exist, when in reality, it is perhaps the most secure and reasonable approach to deterring armed pirates. The same reason that army soldiers carry weapons. The same reason that police carry weapons. The same reason that security guards carry weapons. The same reason that many civilians carry weapons.
May I suggest, that if most rational people who would be asked why police carry weapons, were re-asked why oil tankers should carry weapons, the answer would be the same.
These are the same vessels that transport huge quantities of all kinds of goods, chemicals, military hardware, and other toxic, dangerous, or harmful substances. It would be pathetic to think of transporting large quantities of cash from bank to bank without armed guards. How much more so the cargo of merchant ships in the middle of the ocean?
In summary, why did you not mention this as a possibility in your otherwise excellent article?
Citizen, Father, Business Owner
Update: as soon as I posted this, these were the possibly related links that appeared. Interesting…